Lilan Yang and Mike Boylan-Kolchin tell us about high redshift JWST galaxies. Lilan is one of the astronomers using JWST to look at high redshifts and find new galaxies. Mike is a cosmologist who has pioneered looking at these high redshift galaxies to think about cosmology.
Lilan: https://db.ipmu.jp/member/personal/6862en.html
Mike: https://mrbk.github.io/
Papers: 2207.13101, 2207.13527, 2208.01611, 2212.06666
Jenny Wagner gives us the observational case for and against the Cosmological Principle, based on a paper she and 22 co-authors wrote summarising this case.
She starts by clearly defining what the Cosmological Principle is and then talks us through the observations that she and her coauthors find to be the most compelling evidence against the assumptions of full statistical isotropy and homogeneity. In each case she gives us the story either “side” would need to tell to reconcile the observation (the standard, FLRW side and the inhomogeneous cosmology side). Continue reading
Members from the Dark Energy Survey and Kilo Degree Survey have teamed up to do a joint cosmic shear analysis, complete with final cosmology results. They tell us the final cosmology results, and go into details explaining what the technical difficulties were to combine the data sets.
Talk slides: docs.google.com/presentation…
Dongwon Han, Niall MacCrann, Mathew Madhavacheril, Frank Qu and Blake Sherwin tell us about the Atacama Cosmology Telescope’s latest measurement of CMB weak lensing (“Advanced ACT” to be precise).
It is quite the measurement. Despite ACT being on the ground, the measurement now rivals the best Planck lensing measurement. This means the additional complications of the atmosphere have been overcome, and the better technology of telescope possible from not having to put something in space are starting to win. Continue reading
Jeongin Moon, David Valcin and Christoph Saulder tell us about the first cosmologically relevant results from DESI (The Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument). Specifically, they are presenting the first detection of the BAO (Baryon Acoustic Oscillations) from DESI.
With a “first detection” one would expect something mediocre, but even this result, using only two months of DESI data, has similar precision to the final BOSS data after years of operation. This is a very exciting time for cosmology as we wait for the full one year DESI results and cosmological constraints. Continue reading
Giovanni Arico tells us about his recent work adding baryons to the modelling of Dark Energy Survey cosmic shear analysis. By adding baryonic modelling he and collaborators are able to use all of the DES data. Continue reading
Minh Nguyen tells us about his recent work looking for evidence of modified gravity in cosmological observations. Rather than look at a specific model, Minh and his collaborators look for evidence of a deviation in the “growth index” γ.
In general relativity and ΛCDM γ≃0.55 but in a more general theory of gravity it could deviate. Minh looks at measurements of peculiar velocity, clustering and Planck CMB data (temperature, polarisation and lensing) and finds 3.7σ evidence for γ greater than 0.55. Continue reading
Stuart tells us about his recent work exploring how to use peculiar velocity measurements to constrain modified gravity (specifically f(R) and DGP models). He finds that even using just linear scales we would be able to detect or rule out model parameter regions that would be entirely consist with current measurements of the background expansion.
He does this by predicting the auto and cross spectra between galaxy overdensity and peculiar velocity, using just linear theory – and then analysing those observables in modified gravity simulations to measure the parameters used in the simulations.
At this point it is just a proof of concept, as for each modified gravity scenario the method is only constraining the linear galaxy bias and one model parameter (other cosmological parameters are known) and also not taking into account additional observational uncertainties involved in measuring peculiar velocities in the real world.
Still, the method does work, at least when the effect produces a large enough deviation from LCDM so the proof of concept works. Future careful work with 6DF and SDSS data (and, one day soon, DESI) should allow the method to bring about real constraints on these models.
Johannes Lange tells us about his recent work with collaborators constraining cosmological parameters, in particular S8, using the non-linear scales in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) and the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS).
They generate predictions for the non-linear scales via the Aemulus suite of simulations, which ran with a variety of cosmological parameters. To connect the simulations’ halos with galaxy observations they use a halo occupation distribution (HOD) model to generate a large number of sets of mock galaxies. The halo model parameters are then marginalised over when comparing the mocks to observations, ultimately giving the final cosmology constraints.
As with more or less all other large scale structure probes nowadays they find a mild tension between their constraints and predictions for S8 coming from CMB observations and the LCDM model.
Johannes: https://johannesulf.github.io/
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08692
halotools code: https://github.com/astropy/halotools
dsigma code: https://github.com/johannesulf/dsigma
Keir tells us about constraints on the fraction of dark matter that could be “ultralight” at various masses.
It seems probable now that one single mass of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) can’t be responsible for all the dark matter, but this doesn’t mean it can’t be a sub-component of the dark matter. The structure suppressing properties of ULDM could also have implications for the S8 tension, i.e. maybe a small sub-component of ULDM is what is causing the low S8 in local measurements?
The observational data Keir considers are the Planck CMB data and BOSS clustering data.
Cosmology Talks 